The Pokémon TCG Pocket universe is vast… with many strategies, combinations, and synergies. While many cards hang together to make competitive decks, others fall short of making an impact. This article tackles some of the least effective cards in the game by investigating their weaknesses, potential improvement, and what they reveal about the trouble of deck building.

Got questions about guilds, gaming, or our product? Join our Discord for discussions and support!

Exploring the Underwhelming Cards

1. Goat and Skidoo

Though designed well, Goat, and Skiddo won’t make it in the competitive arena. Skiddo has 70 HP and a not-so-powerful attack that does puny 40 damage that hardly dents even mediocre opponents. Goat is even worse, requiring three energy to perform an unimpressive attack, keeping it out of competitive viability in decks that utilized Grass energy.

2. Tangela

Tangela’s basic evolution and low cost end up squashed between inefficiency. An attack needing two energy for a measly 40 damage and a pitiful 10 HP healing is definitely pathetic. With only 80 HP, Tangela usually loses out in battles most of the time.

3. Swana and Ducklett

Oddly enough, this pair shows just how bad card design can be. Swana has, for example, a stage-one Pokémon with 90 HP needing three energies to perform an unimpressive 70-damage attack. In turn, Ducklett, its pre-evolution, has a miserable 50 HP, needing two energy for an attack that only does 30 damage. With these stats, the cards wouldn’t make it into any deck in any competitive setting.

4. Nidoqueen and Nidoking Line

Nidoqueen and Nidoking make a good case for improvement, yet their heavy-handedness is disadvantageous. Setting up two stage-two Pokémon, plus enough energy, takes some incredible luck and an even heavier resource line. While the idea is beautiful, putting it into practice is impossible-with this line almost invariably failing.

Why Do Some Cards Struggle?

• High Energy Costs: Cards like Gyarados demand significant energy investments for mediocre returns. For example, Gyarados requires four water energy to deal 100 damage—far too much effort for such an underwhelming payoff.

• Low Durability: Many of these underperforming cards have low HP, making them easy targets. Rattata, for instance, has only 40 HP, rendering it virtually useless in most competitive scenarios.

• Lack of Synergy: Some cards require overly specific setups. Ditto, for example, demands exact energy types to use its opponent’s attacks. This limitation makes it difficult to incorporate into decks with varied strategies.

Missed Opportunities for Improvement

• Gyarados: As an iconic Pokémon, Gyarados deserves a stronger presence. Reducing its energy cost or adding effects like splash damage could make it a competitive option.

• Ditto: Ditto’s potential is hindered by its rigid energy requirements. Allowing it to use generic energy or introducing a support card to complement its unique mechanics could transform it into a valuable asset.

• Snorlax: While Snorlax is often used as a wall, its four-energy retreat cost makes it a liability. Adjusting this cost or enhancing its tanking abilities would make it more viable in competitive play.

The Role of Utility Cards

While some cards, like Chansey and Snorlax, are marketed as defensive tools, they often fall into the “bait card” category. These cards lure players with their high HP or unique abilities but ultimately fail to provide substantial benefits in competitive matches. Experienced players can exploit their weaknesses, such as high retreat costs or low offensive output, making them a risky choice for serious play. Master Advanced Pokémon TCG Pocket Strategies Today from our Strategy Guide.

How to Build Better Decks

• Focus on Versatility: Choose cards that are able to function in many situations. Pokémons requiring colorless energy or flexible abilities generally outperform niche cards like Tangela or Ducklett.

• Prioritize Efficiency: Seek cards that have the highest reward for the energy spent. Strong multi-effect attacks yield better margins than attacks with one purpose.

• Embrace Synergy: Build decks around cohesive strategies. Avoid cards that require specific setups unless they align seamlessly with your deck’s core mechanics.

Conclusion

While not every card in Pokémon TCG Pocket is a winner, understanding their limitations can help you make smarter deck-building choices. Whether it’s avoiding high-energy liabilities or seeking cards with better synergy, analyzing underperforming options can sharpen your gameplay. For the best experience, play Pokémon TCG Pocket on PC or Laptop with BlueStacks and take your card battles to the next level!